Branching Workflows
What is a Branching Workflow?
A branching workflow is a strategy for how you and your team use branches to organize work in a Git repository.
It defines how features, fixes, releases, and collaboration happen—making teamwork smoother and your project history clearer.
Why Use a Workflow?
- Organization:
Keeps features, fixes, and releases separate. - Collaboration:
Allows multiple people to work independently. - Safety:
Protects stable code from unfinished or experimental changes. - Traceability:
Makes it easy to see what was done, when, and by whom.
Common Branching Workflows
1. Feature Branch Workflow
- Each new feature or fix gets its own branch.
- Branches are created from the main branch (often called
mainormaster). - When finished, the feature branch is merged back into
main.
Example:
git checkout -b feature/login
- Work on your feature, then merge:
git checkout main
git merge feature/login
Benefits:
Keeps features isolated, makes code review easier.
2. Gitflow Workflow
A popular workflow for larger projects.
- Main branches:
main(ormaster): Always stable, production-ready code.develop: Integration branch for new features.
- Supporting branches:
feature/*: For new features.release/*: For preparing releases.hotfix/*: For urgent fixes to production.
Example:
git checkout -b feature/payment develop
- Merge features into
develop, then create a release branch when ready.
Benefits:
Organized, clear process for releases and hotfixes.
3. Trunk-Based Development
- Everyone works on a single branch (usually
main). - Feature branches are short-lived—merged quickly.
- Encourages frequent integration and small changes.
Example:
git checkout -b quick-fix
# Make changes
git checkout main
git merge quick-fix
Benefits:
Fast-paced, reduces merge conflicts, ideal for continuous integration.
4. Fork + Pull Request Workflow
Common on platforms like GitHub and GitLab.
- Each contributor forks the repository (creates their own copy).
- Work happens in branches on the fork.
- Changes are proposed back to the original repo via a pull request (PR).
Example:
- Fork the repo.
- Create a branch on your fork:
git checkout -b feature/docs - Push and open a PR to the main repo.
Benefits:
Safe for open source, allows code review before merging.
Choosing a Workflow
- Small teams/projects:
Feature branch or trunk-based is often enough. - Large teams/multiple releases:
Gitflow or fork + PR workflows add structure. - Open source:
Fork + PR is standard.
Workflow Tips
- Name branches clearly:
Use descriptive names likefeature/login,bugfix/header, orhotfix/payment-crash. - Keep branches focused:
One feature or fix per branch. - Merge often:
Avoid long-lived branches to reduce conflicts. - Protect important branches:
Use branch protection rules onmainordevelopto prevent accidental changes.
Tip:
Pick a workflow that matches your team size, release process, and collaboration style.
Document your workflow so everyone knows how to
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.